Executive risk & savings brief
Combine supplier, spend, contract, AP, and risk signals into a decision-ready brief with evidence gaps and follow-up actions.
Agentic procurement systems assemble context, plan multi-step work, call approved tools, check results, pause at named checkpoints, and act in connected systems. We configure each deployment around your evidence, rules, roles, and tools, using our in-house harness or the agent platform your organisation has selected.

Strategic questions, approvals, contracts, supplier follow-up, exceptions, and planning decisions cross teams and tools. Agents can assemble the context, decide the next working step, use approved tools, and return the result where the process continues.
An agent keeps working toward a defined outcome. It assembles context, chooses the next approved action, uses a tool, checks the result, and continues until the task is complete or a named review is required.
Break a procurement goal into the next actions, dependencies, evidence needs, and review points.
Adjust when information is missing, inconsistent, late, or spread across different formats and systems.
Query data, prepare documents, call connected services, and write back through defined system paths.
Carry context across ERP, Source-to-Pay, CLM, AP, planning, portals, email, files, and team channels.
Stop before supplier contact, awards, policy exceptions, payment decisions, or other named actions.
Return the working output, evidence used, actions taken, open issues, approval decisions, and run history.
The harness supplies instructions, context, approved models and tools, output checks, action limits, recovery paths, and run history. It stops when evidence is missing and routes exact approvals to named people.
The architecture and operating choices needed to move an agent from a useful demonstration into accepted procurement work.
The examples below are starting points. We configure agents for the business goal, evidence, tools, rules, owners, checkpoints, and output your team needs.
Combine supplier, spend, contract, AP, and risk signals into a decision-ready brief with evidence gaps and follow-up actions.
Reconcile demand, spend, market context, supplier options, and contract positions into a working category and negotiation pack.
Bring risk evidence, obligations, issues, and performance trends together, then prepare an action plan and owner routes.
Turn quotes and requests into a review-ready PO draft, identify missing evidence, and prepare the exact system submission.
Compare the invoice, PO, receipt, contract, and tolerance rules, then prepare the release, reject, or route recommendation.
Check demand, planned orders, lead times, capacity, and minimum quantities before coordinating supplier follow-up.
Other starting points
Each example below has been built and tested in our product environment. Customer results are established through a scoped pilot against an agreed baseline.
Accounts payable
Built and testedAP teams compare invoices, purchase orders, receipts, contracts, and tolerance rules by hand, then chase missing confirmation before they can resolve the exception.
The agent assembles the evidence, identifies the mismatch or missing record, and prepares the release, reject, or route recommendation. It waits for the named approval before any AP update.
Minutes per exception
Evidence coverage
Exception cycle time
Rework rate
Supplier management
Built and testedRisk evidence, certificates, obligations, emails, and supplier performance sit in different places. Reviewers spend time finding documents before they can assess the issue.
The agent brings the approved supplier evidence together, flags missing or expired items, prepares the review, and drafts the follow-up request. Supplier contact remains behind a named approval.
Review preparation time
Evidence completeness
Manual follow-ups
Supplier response time
Category management
Built and testedCategory teams rebuild recurring packs from spend, supplier, contract, renewal, and market data. Analysis time is lost to collection and reconciliation.
The agent assembles the approved sources, highlights contract coverage, concentration, renewal exposure, and evidence gaps, then prepares a category brief with savings actions for procurement and finance review.
Pack preparation time
Spend coverage
Actions accepted
Actions completed on time
Planning and supply
Built and testedPlanners check demand, planned orders, lead times, capacity, and minimum quantities before contacting suppliers about shortages or date changes.
The agent assembles the planning evidence, identifies at-risk quantities and dates, and prepares the supplier confirmation request. Contact and MRP updates stay behind exact approval points.
Planner effort per lane
Confirmation cycle time
Overdue responses
Shortages addressed
We can demonstrate how an agent receives a goal, assembles evidence, selects approved tools, completes working steps, pauses at exact approvals, acts in connected systems, and records the run. A scoped pilot then adapts one agentic use case to your systems, roles, rules, and acceptance measures. The customer deployment can use our harness or a selected agent platform.
Published percentages require a customer baseline, an accepted pilot result, and permission to disclose it.
We baseline the current work, define the sources and approvals, build the connections, test real cases, and train the team that owns the agent system.
Compare current effort, delays, errors, and business impact. Select the task, then define its evidence, tools, owners, approvals, exceptions, output, and acceptance measures.
Configure the agentic system, connect approved tools, systems, files, and channels, then test normal cases, missing evidence, exceptions, approvals, and system updates.
Train owners, reviewers, and operators on real cases. Provide the runbook, review routine, issue path, and change process needed to operate and extend the agent system.

Your ERP, Source-to-Pay platform, CLM, AP tools, planning systems, portals, files, and work channels remain in place. The agentic layer connects the evidence, tools, decisions, and handoffs needed to complete the work.
Strategic workExecutive briefs, category reviews, savings analysis, and supplier exposure.
Operational workOnboarding, approvals, PO drafts, contract checks, supplier coordination, and invoice exceptions.
Work channelsWeb, email, Teams, files, schedules, and approved source-system paths.
Agents complete approved analysis, preparation, and routing. People retain the decisions and external actions that carry commercial, supplier, financial, or policy consequences.
Agents use the systems, files, messages, tools, and data paths approved for the task and the requester.
Each agent run follows defined ownership, evidence rules, exceptions, and actions that remain with people.
Supplier contact, system updates, awards, invoice decisions, and policy exceptions stop at a named action boundary.
Teams can inspect source coverage, blockers, prepared actions, approval decisions, completed updates, and audit records.
The deployment begins with real procurement work and a clear acceptance test. It expands when the workflow proves useful, reliable, and ready for wider use.
Choose a strategic or operational outcome with enough volume, friction, or business value to justify a pilot.
Map the systems, files, policies, people, evidence, exceptions, and action paths the work depends on.
Test real cases, measure output acceptance, resolve evidence gaps, and confirm each approval and fallback route.
Add related work, recurring reviews, channels, tools, and approved system updates as the deployment proves its value.
Compare the pilot with the current process. Expand when the workflow improves the measures that matter to the team.
Bring the business task, systems, evidence constraints, tools, and decision points. We will define a focused deployment and acceptance path.